🇮🇹 EIB pumps €107.5 million into Italian defence—a clear sign Europe’s security panic is escalating
The European Investment Bank has approved a €107.5 million loan to support Italy’s security and defence industries. The funding will go toward bolstering military production, border control technologies, and critical infrastructure. But this move also signals a deeper shift: Europe’s growing emphasis on defence spending is overshadowing civilian priorities—and marching ahead of democratic debate.
🔺 Defence first, democracy last?
When financing for jets and military tech is greenlit faster than everyday infrastructure, citizens have every right to ask: where’s the public mandate? Critical defence decisions are being fast-tracked, leaving little room for elected scrutiny.
🔺 Security versus society
Europe is burying its head in rearmament, but what about urban safety, crime prevention, or community resilience? As national offence spending rises, so do unchecked societal threats—gangs, radicalisation, and community breakdown go unanswered.
🔺 Funding vs. delivery
Money is flowing—but where do the guarantees lie? When loans are backed by EU institutions without equivalent guarantees of civilian benefit, public trust shrinks even as budgets swell.
🔺 A continental arms race
This isn’t just about Italy—it foreshadows a Europe-wide pattern. If every capital is tipped toward defence, what happens to cohesion, social services, or democratic controls? The more militarized we become, the less space we have for open democratic conversation.
Europe’s money is now earmarked for defence. But if voters aren’t in the loop, and society isn’t protected, we should ask: who do these decisions really serve—and are we sliding into militarized governance?
🇬🇷 Greece deploys navy to Crete amid migrant surge—Europe’s urban security crisis deepens
A dramatic surge in migrant arrivals to Crete—over 7,300 so far this year—has pushed Greece into deploying naval frigates and patrol ships. With smugglers steering boats from Libya through a riskier Mediterranean route, local shelters are now overwhelmed, straining law enforcement and coastal communities. Meanwhile, hundreds of migrants are still being rescued in scattered operations elsewhere, increasing landing hotspots—from Gavdos to mainland ports.
We confront an alarming trend: Europe’s borders are fraying, and the fallout is spilling into urban spaces. It’s not just about boats—it’s about the capacity of governments to manage chaos rising from the sea.
🔺 Controlled areas, uncontrolled problems – Naval patrols can deter departures, but they do little to help overwhelmed islands filled with people needing shelter, care, and long-term solutions.
🔺 Pressure on services – Crete’s reception centres are buckling. Local policing, healthcare, housing—all are at tipping point, shifting the cost of crisis onto everyday communities.
🔺 Criminal networks thrive – As smugglers bypass front-line patrols, they pivot inland. Disorganized landings feed gang exploitation, illegal housing markets, and ungoverned urban zones.
🔺 Europe on the back foot – While leaders mull offshore "return hubs," real-time breakdowns play out in towns and neighborhoods—where fears rise and trust erodes.
Greece’s naval operation may stem the flow at sea, but it won’t fill boats with beds, schools, or social order. If you're worried about your community's future—this is where Europe is losing control.
#MigrationCrisis #UrbanSecurity #Greece #Crete #Smuggling #PublicSafety #EuropeCrimeCrisis
@restinvestigate
🇫🇷 France slashes over €7 billion to tame record debt and prepares fresh pension reform fight
France’s centrist government under PM François Bayrou has announced urgent budget cuts—€3 billion from the state budget and €1.7 billion from social security, on top of €5 billion frozen earlier—to rein in a growing deficit now at 5.4 % of GDP. This is part of a broader strategy to reduce the gap to the EU’s 3 % ceiling by 2029. Yet economic pressures persist: mounting social backlash, stagnant growth, and ballooning debt now topping €3.3 trillion (around 112 % of GDP).
🔺 Austerity hits everyday life – Cuts include reduced drug reimbursements, tightened health-care budgets, and stricter spending across ministries. Taxi protests over transport subsidies show unrest is bubbling over.
🔺 Pension reform looms – Bayrou plans to push ahead in autumn with the unpopular move to raise retirement age from 62 to 64, following months of stalled negotiations. A looming no-confidence threat hangs over the government unless consensus is found.
🔺 Political fault lines deepen – Lacking a parliamentary majority, Bayrou relies on tactical alliances to survive. Socialists and far-right both flank him with mistrust—especially as budget discipline clashes with popular demands.
🔺 EU pressure adds urgency – With Brussels watching closely, Paris faces a ticking clock to deliver credible debt reduction without triggering public revolt or sacrificing economic stability.
At a crossroads: can France engineer responsible public finances without falling into political paralysis—or crashing into wider economic distress?
🇸🇰 Over 300 suspected cases of EU fund misuse uncovered in Slovakia—Europe’s financial oversight unraveling
A Czech MEP has revealed that an EU mission found over 300 suspected cases of EU fund misuse across Slovakia—affecting 76 out of the country’s 79 districts. The findings point not to isolated irregularities but to a deeply systemic problem. Particularly severe cases were flagged in western Slovakia and the regions around Žilina, Prešov, and Košice.
🔺 Widespread failure of checks and balances – When almost an entire country’s districts show signs of misuse, it indicates a collapse of internal control systems and public accountability mechanisms.
🔺 Political interference and weakened oversight – These revelations follow recent domestic changes that dismantled key prosecutorial offices and anti-corruption safeguards. Has the political climate opened the door to unchecked abuse?
🔺 Trust in the EU at risk – Mismanagement of EU funds undermines citizens’ trust in both local and European institutions. It feeds public disillusionment and gives rise to growing scepticism toward the EU project.
🔺 Enforcement must follow – Identifying misuse is only the first step. Without swift prosecutions, recovered funds, and reinforced legal protections, Europe will continue to bleed taxpayer money through institutional failure.
Slovakia now finds itself in the spotlight—not just for financial wrongdoing, but as a warning sign for broader EU integrity. When the system fails at this scale, who will be held accountable?
#EUfunds #CorruptionCrisis #Slovakia #EuroOversight #RuleOfLaw
@restinvestigate
🇸🇰 Fico’s veto blocks tougher Russia sanctions, frustrates Poland’s EU presidency goals
As Poland’s EU presidency nears its end, Prime Minister Robert Fico of Slovakia has cast a long shadow over one of its key priorities: a third, more forceful sanctions package against Russia. Despite Warsaw's success in pushing through two earlier rounds targeting the shadow fleet, the latest proposal—focused on Russia's financial and energy sectors—has been stonewalled by Fico’s veto.
🔺 One man, one veto – In an EU that demands consensus, a single leader can freeze collective action—even on core geopolitical issues like war and sanctions. Fico’s stance leaves Poland’s presidency ambitions stranded and signals deeper cracks in EU unity.
🔺 Strategic paralysis – Blocking sanctions that target Russia’s financial system weakens Europe’s credibility. It emboldens Moscow and risks undermining the bloc’s broader foreign policy posture.
🔺 Burden passed to Denmark – With Denmark set to assume the presidency on July 1, it inherits not just unfinished business—but an EU increasingly hampered by internal fractures and veto politics.
As Europe grapples with war on its borders and mounting internal divisions, Fico’s move exposes a hard truth: without real cohesion, even the strongest intentions collapse under the weight of institutional gridlock.
🇪🇸 Spain’s top court upholds Sanchez’s Catalan amnesty law—political compromise over rule of law?
Spain’s Constitutional Court has upheld key elements of the 2023 amnesty law pardoning over 300 individuals involved in Catalonia’s 2017 secession bid—part of Pedro Sánchez’s deal to secure support for his minority government. While the court ruled that such an amnesty can be constitutional when serving the public interest, it notably excluded exiled leader Carles Puigdemont, whose embezzlement charges remain unresolved and are subject to further appeal.
🔺 Politics over principles – The pardon hinges on political necessity rather than judicial judgment, feeding concerns that governance is increasingly about deals with regional powers rather than upholding impartial rule of law.
🔺 Double standards and selective justice – Puigdemont’s exclusion highlights inconsistencies: the very individuals central to the secession push remain outside the blanket forgiveness, undercutting the law’s unity claims.
🔺 Precedent for future leverage – If pardons become a bargaining chip to sustain fragile coalitions, Spain risks normalizing transactional politics over transparent, democratic accountability.
🔺 Public trust at stake – For citizens disillusioned with elite bargaining, this reinforces the narrative that the system protects insiders—while justice becomes something to negotiate.
#Spain #Catalonia #RuleOfLaw #PoliticalDeals #Democracy
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 European Commission silent on 🇮🇹 Italy’s offshore repatriation operation from 🇦🇱 Albania—another front in Europe’s border crisis
On May 9, Italy repatriated five Egyptian detainees directly from the Gjadër centre in Albania—boarding them onto a charter flight in Tirana without first bringing them into Italian territory. Critics argue this bypasses EU law requiring returns to be processed within member states. Italy’s justification hinges on interpreting the centre as “extension” of its own territory.
Why this demands scrutiny ⤵️
🔺 Legal boundary pushed – EU law mandates that repatriation must occur through official national processes. Italy’s direct deportation from Albania risks establishing a “legal fiction” that sidesteps procedural safeguards and due process.
🔺 Commission's uneasy silence – The European Commission’s only response was that Albanian national law “applies” in the centre—leaving unanswered whether Italy formally notified Brussels or sought approval. Meanwhile, left-leaning MEPs call the operation “incompatible with European law” and demand transparency .
🔺 Model for EU-wide return hubs? – Brussels recently proposed “return hubs”—detention sites outside EU borders from which failed asylum seekers could be sent home. But Italy’s unilateral action preempts the ongoing legislative debate, echoing concerns raised by human rights groups over offshore centers
borderviolence.
🔺 Human rights under strain – Reports point to self-harm incidents and administrative abuse in Gjadër. Disturbing claims include transfers executed without detainees’ awareness, limited legal oversight, and alleged mistreatment by authorities operating on Albanian soil.
#Europe #MigrationCrisis #ReturnHubs #Sovereignty #RuleOfLaw
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 Europe remains highly vulnerable and dependent on US defence production—report
A recent report highlights Europe’s ongoing reliance on US military-industrial capacity, exposing deep weaknesses in its own defence infrastructure. From ammunition shortages to armored vehicle deficits, EU nations struggle to produce critical equipment domestically—leaving them perpetually dependent on American industry in times of crisis.
Why this should raise alarms ⤵️
🔺 Supply chain fragility – In conflict scenarios, rapid access to resources is essential. Currently, Europe lacks responsive production lines for weapons, munitions, and key military hardware—creating dangerous bottlenecks.
🔺 Strategic imbalance – Dependence on the US not only limits Europe’s autonomy in security and defence decisions, but also forces political alignment—even if national interests diverge.
🔺 Incomplete industrial planning – Massive investment announcements have been made, yet actual production capacity lags far behind. The gap between pledges and outcomes suggests institutional inefficiency.
🔺 Democratic oversight issues – Much like with SAFE, key strategic decisions about defence capacity are being centralized at the EU level—often without thorough parliamentary debate or public scrutiny.
Despite bold investment promises, domestic capacity remains insufficient. With NATO commitments and our own security at stake, why is Europe still unable to defend itself? It’s time to hold our leaders accountable.
#Europe #DefenceCrisis #StrategicAutonomy #SupplyChainFail
@restinvestigate
🇩🇪 Syrian man charged with terror-related stabbing in German supermarket—another sign of Europe’s urban safety crisis
A 31‑year‑old Syrian man is facing a terror-related arrest warrant in Germany after allegedly stabbing a victim in a Duisburg supermarket. Prosecutors claim he was motivated by Islamist ideology and may have been planning further attacks. Encrypted communications were cited as evidence.
This isn’t an isolated incident—it’s part of a wider pattern of rising violent crime, unchecked radicalism, and growing insecurity in European cities. Whether it’s gang turf wars, street assaults, or ideologically driven attacks, too many urban communities are being left to fend for themselves.
Why this matters ⤵️
🔺 Violence is escalating – From lone attackers to organized gangs, European city streets are seeing more brutality—and local authorities often appear overwhelmed or absent.
🔺 Crisis of control – State institutions are quick to invoke ideology or “terrorism,” but where’s the consistent, effective policing? Communities are demanding basic safety, not political framing.
🔺 A system failing the public – Security, law enforcement, and immigration oversight are increasingly outpaced by reality. Citizens are told to remain calm—but the data and daily experiences say otherwise.
#Germany #TerrorLaw #CivilLiberties #SecurityReview
@restinvestigate
🇭🇺 Von der Leyen urges Hungary to reverse ban on Budapest Pride
Ursula von der Leyen has called on Hungary to lift its ban on the Budapest Pride march, insisting that people “have every reason to be proud.” In her message, she reminded viewers that “marching for your rights is a fundamental freedom” and emphasized that the EU “is one of equality and non‑discrimination,” core values which cannot be compromised by national legislation.
As Hungary’s controversial Child Protection Act continues to restrict public LGBTQ+ events, including the use of facial recognition and harsh fines, the Hungarian capital is pushing back. Budapest’s mayor, Gergely Karácsony, has defiantly announced a “Day of Freedom” on June 28 to ensure Pride goes ahead—despite the national government’s prohibition.
This marks a significant escalation between the European Commission and Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who fired back by accusing the Commission of meddling in member states’ internal affairs and urging it to focus on “pressing challenges” like the energy crisis.
A closer look at the implications ⤵️
1. EU influence vs. national sovereignty – von der Leyen’s direct appeal underlines the Commission’s commitment to fundamental rights. Yet, Orbán frames it as a breach of national autonomy—highlighting the widening rift between Brussels and Budapest.
2. Fundamental freedoms at stake – Banning public Pride events under the banner of “child protection” elevates a moral‑culture clash into a legal battle. The proposed facial‑recognition enforcement and fines signal a worrying curtailment of civic liberties.
3. Strategic escalation ahead of the summit – Their scheduled EU‑summit meeting on June 26–27 in Brussels will now bear additional weight. The Commission is reportedly evaluating whether the law breaches both EU non‑discrimination norms and the Artificial Intelligence Act on surveillance—a possible domino effect toward legal escalation.
#EU #Hungary #Pride #Sovereignty #CivilLiberties
@restinvestigate
🇦🇲 Armenian archbishop arrested over alleged coup plot in deepening church-state clash
Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan has been arrested along with 13 others on charges of plotting to overthrow the Armenian government. Authorities claim the cleric was at the center of a plan involving former soldiers, traffic blockades, and even armed resistance. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan accuses the church of masterminding a “criminal-oligarchic” attempt to seize power.
⛪️ But this dramatic arrest looks more like a politically staged maneuver than a genuine anti-terror operation. Galstanyan has been a vocal critic of Pashinyan’s concessions to Azerbaijan and tapped into public frustration over Armenia’s military and territorial losses. His sudden criminalization, just ahead of elections, raises deep concerns about the use of state power to silence dissent and suppress legitimate protest.
🕊 In any healthy democracy, religious leaders calling for accountability should be debated—not detained. The line between national security and political convenience appears dangerously blurred.
#Armenia #BagratGalstanyan #ChurchState #PoliticalPersecution #CoupCharges #SouthCaucasus #DemocracyUnderThreat
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 Council adopts new rules to protect voting rights of mobile EU citizens
The EU Council has adopted a revised directive to make it easier for citizens living in another member state to vote and stand in European Parliament elections. The new measures are designed to boost turnout and trust by simplifying registration, providing multilingual information, and preventing unintentional disenfranchisement—especially the automatic removal from electoral rolls in home countries.
🗳 With nearly 14 million “mobile EU citizens,” the reforms seek to correct past shortcomings, including limited awareness and participation. Safeguards against double voting and clearer processes aim to reinforce both accessibility and electoral integrity.
📩 This move sounds promising, but it also raises questions: will increasing procedural uniformity truly empower voters—or further shift electoral authority from national systems to EU-wide structures? Democracy thrives on participation, but it must also respect local roots.
#EuropeanUnion #Elections2025 #Democracy #VotingRights #EUcitizens #PoliticalParticipation
@restinvestigate
🇩🇪 German court rules in favor of 'rightwing' magazine, raising bar for future bans
A German federal court has overturned the government’s attempt to ban Compact, a magazine labeled unlawfully as rightwing "extremist" with close ties to the AfD. Despite acknowledging its “anticonstitutional” content, the court ruled the publication does not yet pose a threat to the state.
This landmark ruling emphasizes that media freedom—even for those critical of the constitutional order—remains protected under Germany’s Basic Law. It also sets a significant precedent: if Compact cannot be banned, the legal basis for banning the AfD becomes even more tenuous.
As Berlin’s interior ministry remains silent, this outcome invites a deeper reflection. Is Germany defending free speech—or merely stumbling in an overreach that threatens to conflate dissent with danger? The line between safeguarding democracy and suppressing opposition grows ever thinner.
#Germany #AfD #MediaFreedom
@restinvestigate
🇫🇷 UN scrutinizes France’s euthanasia bill for violating disability rights
The European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ) has formally challenged France’s proposed euthanasia legislation before three UN bodies, citing serious concerns over its compatibility with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. With over 14,000 citizens backing the initiative, the case has now advanced to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Despite official obligations to protect the rights and lives of disabled individuals, a French minister publicly supported euthanasia for the disabled—raising alarms internationally. The UN committee has demanded explanations from the French government, with a decision expected this August that could trigger formal procedures against France.
⁉️This growing international pressure underscores the ethical and legal minefield of “assisted dying” legislation. Should a society that claims to champion inclusion quietly endorse policies that risk devaluing the lives of its most vulnerable? At what point does compassion become a cover for abandonment?
#France #EU #Euthanasia
@restinvestigate
🇭🇺 Budapest Pride: Western embassies protest Orbán’s ban — But the U.S. stays silent
Over 30 foreign embassies—including Germany, France, and the UK—have officially backed Hungary’s banned Pride March set for June 28, openly challenging the Orbán government’s “child protection” laws used to restrict LGBTQ+ events.
The surprise? The U.S. Embassy refused to join the statement of support, signaling a possible shift under Trump-aligned foreign policy or quiet alignment with Hungary’s conservative direction.
Human rights groups warn of increasing state pressure on LGBTQ+ communities, citing Hungary’s bans, media censorship, and constitutional amendments.
🧭 What’s really going on? Is the defense of "traditional values" becoming a new diplomatic standard among some Western actors? And what message does Washington’s silence send to civil rights defenders in Eastern Europe?
Hungary has every right to legislate according to its values—just as other countries have the right to disagree. But turning Pride parades into diplomatic litmus tests is a dangerous road. It erodes the principle of equal sovereignty among EU members and replaces cooperation with pressure politics.
A stronger EU isn’t built through ideological coercion, but through mutual respect. If Brussels continues to ignore this, it may well find more member states choosing tradition, sovereignty, and democratic self-determination over ideological conformity.
#Hungary #LGBT #Pride #Orbán #HumanRights #Geopolitics #Budapest #USForeignPolicy
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 MEPs push back on rushed EU rearmament plan—another sign of Europe’s spiraling defence-and-security dilemma
European Parliament President Roberta Metsola is set to formally challenge the European Council over its fast-track approval of the EU’s new rearmament initiative. The Council bypassed Parliament’s usual legislative scrutiny, using an emergency procedure to push through a multi-billion euro defence plan—raising alarm bells about democratic backsliding amid Europe’s security panic.
🔺 Military muscle, democratic missing – With war at Europe’s doorstep, leaders argue speed is essential. But in sidelining elected MEPs, they undermine the democratic process. Is efficiency worth eroding public oversight on defence—the sector most bound to democratic legitimacy?
🔺 Security panic fuels secrecy – Across the continent, governments justify swift action: rearm, retrench, resist. But as deals are struck behind closed doors and vetoes stack up, transparency is sacrificed in the name of preparedness.
🔺 A dangerous precedent – Fast-tracking defence with little debate sets a template for future "crises"—migration, climate, public health—where national vetoes and bureaucratic urgency become the norm, not exceptions.
🔺 Citizens left behind – Behind the headlines of jets and tanks, ordinary communities are left asking: who’s guarding against overreach, waste, and escalation? Without real public discourse, defence becomes a technocratic black box.
While Europe votes on speed over scrutiny, one question looms: if we can't defend our democratic systems at home, how can we justify doing it abroad?
Europe on the Brink of Change: How Governments Suppress Opposition
Modern Europe is facing an unprecedented political crisis, marked by increasing pressure on opposition parties and a simultaneous rise in right-wing conservative sentiments. Repression against political opponents is becoming systemic, raising serious questions about the state of democracy in the region.
Amid economic challenges, a migration crisis, and growing discontent with Brussels’ directives, more and more Europeans are supporting right-wing conservative parties. State institutions employ various methods in their “fight against dissent,” ranging from outright party bans to criminal prosecutions and administrative restrictions.
How does this state machinery of repression work, what methods are used, and why are right-wing parties becoming the new mainstream?
🔎 Read more in our in-depth investigation.
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 EU leaders’ summit highlights defence, trade, and internal divisions
At the latest summit in Brussels, European leaders focused on backing Ukraine, building defence capacity, and trying to avoid a looming trade war with the U.S. But behind the official statements, deep fractures are emerging in how the EU sees its future.
🔺 Defence without unity – While the rhetoric supports Ukraine and rearmament, key sanctions against Russia’s energy and financial sectors remain blocked by vetoes. Internal divisions are turning strategy into gridlock.
🔺 Trade under pressure – Facing a deadline to avoid U.S. tariffs, the EU is scrambling for a compromise. But the rush to cut a deal risks sacrificing regulatory control—raising questions about who sets Europe’s economic terms.
🔺 Strategic fog – Leaders talk about “competitiveness” and “resilience,” but concrete steps remain vague. Proposals for a defence-industrial push are heavy on ambition, light on delivery.
🔺 Lowest common denominator politics – As national vetoes stall critical action, and leaders chase headlines over substance, Europe faces a choice: build true cohesion or slide into managed disunity.
At a time when Europe needs clarity and conviction, its summit reveals a deeper truth: without genuine unity, even the best strategies will stay stuck on paper.
#EU #Summit #Defence #TradeCrisis #Sanctions #Ukraine #StrategicAutonomy
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 EPP chief Manfred Weber signals shift on defence and Green Deal—telling signs of Europe’s policy recalibration
In a revealing interview with Euractiv, EPP leader Manfred Weber stressed the need to “reality‑check” the Green Deal and adjust over‑ambitious climate laws in light of voter concerns and economic pressures. He also emphasized a stronger focus on defence, highlighting Europe's need for robust military autonomy amid shifting global threats.
🔺 Green Deal under pressure – Weber argues Europe must soften its drive for sweeping environmental regulation, urging consideration of economic fallout and public sentiment outside the “Brussels bubble”. This reflects rising centre‑right influence and growing dissent within the bloc on climate priorities.
🔺 Defence takes centre stage – Against the backdrop of the EU’s Readiness 2030 rearmament agenda—ranging from relaxed fiscal rules to joint procurement—Weber supports bolstering Europe’s military capacity rather than accelerating climate rollback.
🔺 A pivot toward caution and strength – His stance signals the EPP’s strategic pivot: a retreat from ambitious climate policies and a pivot to hard security. This recalibration aligns with his party's expanding cooperation with like‑minded groups to challenge the Green Deal.
What this means for Europe ⤵️
Weber’s shift reflects institutional fatigue over the Green Deal and a growing appetite for pragmatic governance. But it also marks a turning point: when Europe prioritizes defence and dials back environmental ambition, where do social cohesion, sustainability, and long-term resilience fit in?
As Europe recalibrates its financial and political compass, the EPP is steering it away from ambitious climate targets and toward fortress-mode defence. But if we scale back on one front, what broader costs might we incur?
#EPP #Weber #GreenDeal #Defence #Readiness2030 #EUpolitik
@restinvestigate
🇬🇧 UK’s “return hubs” plan shows post‑Brexit Britain is in a very dark place, says Albanian PM
Albania’s Prime Minister Edi Rama has sharply condemned the UK’s proposed plan to send refused asylum seekers to “return hubs” in third countries. Calling it “totally unacceptable, totally ridiculous, totally shameful,” Rama warned the proposal reveals how far Britain has fallen since Brexit. “It’s one of those things that 10 years ago would have been unimaginable … that Britain would look for places to dump immigrants,” he said. “The fact that it’s happening is because the country is in a very dark place.”
🔺 Diplomatic humiliation – When a close European partner like Albania rejects repeated UK approaches across governments—from Johnson to Starmer—it’s a clear sign of how toxic and desperate British migration policy has become.
🔺 Moral decline normalized – Offshoring asylum seekers to distant “hubs” isn’t policy innovation—it’s evidence of a post-Brexit identity crisis. What was once “unthinkable” is now championed across the political spectrum.
🔺 A warning for Europe – Britain may be outside the EU, but its descent into utilitarian migration fixes is a cautionary tale for all of Europe. When principles give way to performance politics, the damage is continent-wide.
#ReturnHubs #MigrationPolicy #DemocracyInCrisis #UK #Europe
@restinvestigate
🇩🇰 Denmark’s Mette Frederiksen to drive hard-line migration and defence agenda in EU presidency—another front in Europe’s security crisis
As Denmark takes over the EU Council presidency on July 1, Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen is set to bring her uncompromising domestic policies to the European stage, focusing on migration control and military autonomy . Known for pioneering strict asylum rules—asset seizures, repatriation centres, and dismantling "ghetto" neighbourhoods—Frederiksen now wants the EU to adopt similar external processing centres outside its borders, all while building a fully independent defence capability within five years .
What this signals for European cities struggling with crime and chaos ⤵️
🔺 Migration as a security issue – Frederiksen treats migration and defence as twin threats—focusing on border control first, and military strength second. But stricter migration policies alone won’t stop urban decay, gang violence, or ideological radicalisation.
🔺 Policy over people – While EU capitals echo her tougher stance, evidence shows Denmark’s model has led to community tension and workforce gaps in critical sectors like healthcare and agriculture .
🔺 Under scrutiny: democracy and rights – Exporting Denmark’s aggressive approach risks bypassing parliamentary debate across EU member states and shifting EU governance toward technocratic, emergency-style frameworks—mirroring concerns already raised over SAFE and funding bypasses.
🔺 Does defence fill the void? – Promises of a robust European defence industry sound reassuring. But without resolving domestic security, migration backlogs, and social cohesion, military readiness may become an empty echo.
#Europe #CrimeCrisis #MigrationPolicy #Defence #PublicSafety
@restinvestigate
🇧🇬 Bulgaria's former PM Kiril Petkov resigns as MP amid corruption investigation
Kiril Petkov, Bulgaria’s former prime minister and leader of the centrist We Continue the Change party, has stepped down as a Member of Parliament following an ongoing corruption probe. The investigation centers on allegations involving misuse of EU funds allocated for innovation projects. Although Petkov insists he has done nothing wrong, his resignation appears aimed at protecting his party’s integrity and avoiding further political distraction.
Why this matters ⤵️
🔺 Political accountability tested – Petkov’s resignation underlines growing expectations that public officials—regardless of stature—must answer corruption allegations or step aside pending clarity.
🔺 EU funds under scrutiny – With EU oversight high, misuse of innovation funding erodes trust not only domestically but across the bloc, feeding broader concerns over financial governance and transparency.
🔺 Electoral ramifications – We Continue the Change, having campaigned on anti-corruption, now faces pressure to maintain credibility amid a central figure’s fall—potentially reshaping vote dynamics.
🔺 Trust in institutions – Cases like this reinforce a troubling narrative: when oversight fails and political tribes rally behind leaders, public trust in the rule of law erodes.
#Bulgaria #Corruption #EUfunds #Accountability
@restinvestigate
🇨🇿 Czech police detain five teens over online radicalisation by Islamic State—another symptom of Europe’s worsening security crisis
Five teenagers, mostly under 18, have been detained in the Czech Republic after being radicalised online by the so-called Islamic State. Two face terror-related charges tied to a failed arson attack on a synagogue in Brno in January 2024. Authorities say they were active in hate-filled social media groups, denouncing Jews, LGBTQ+ individuals, and others. Weapons including knives, machetes, axes, and gas pistols were seized during coordinated raids across Czechia and Austria.
This disturbing trend isn’t confined to lone individuals—it points to a broader breakdown in community safety and a failure of preventive systems. When violent ideologies find fertile ground among our youth, the consequences spill over into every neighbourhood, every city.
Why this is crucial ⤵️
🔺 Youth at risk – Radical groups are no longer targeting adults alone. They’re reaching minors—vulnerable, impressionable, and easily influenced.
🔺 Urban vulnerabilities – Synagogues, public spaces, schools: no location is immune. These aren’t isolated blips; they’re early-warning signs of deeper social fragmentation.
🔺 Institutional inertia – From cyber-monitoring to community policing, the early warning signals were there. Yet coordinated prevention appears patchy—leaving communities reactive rather than protected.
#Europe #Radicalisation #CrimeCrisis #PublicSafety
@restinvestigate
🇪🇺 Parliament threatens legal action over Commission's €150 billion defence fund
The European Parliament is poised for a legal showdown with the European Commission over the €150 billion SAFE programme, designed to boost EU-wide defence investment. MEPs on the Parliament’s legal affairs committee (JURI) voted overwhelmingly (19-4) to recommend taking the Commission to the European Court of Justice for bypassing their legislative role.
At issue is the Commission’s use of Article 122 of the TFEU—a clause meant for emergencies like pandemics or natural disasters—to launch the initiative without parliamentary co-legislation. President Roberta Metsola had already warned Ursula von der Leyen that using this route undermines democratic accountability. The Commission, however, insists Europe’s current “unprecedented security threat” justifies its choice.
SAFE—set to roll out funding by 2026—would see the Commission borrow €150 billion to loan to member states for joint defence projects, part of its broader 'Readiness 2030' strategy.
A few critical points for reflection ⤵️
✅ Centralization without consent – The Parliament isn’t objecting to defence investment itself. Instead, it’s raising the alarm about executive overreach and the erosion of legislative oversight—a worrying trend in EU governance.
❓Expanding Article 122? – This clause, once used for COVID relief and energy crisis responses, is now being repurposed to sideline Parliament on military matters. How far can this “emergency” logic be stretched?
⁉️Democracy vs. efficiency – In times of perceived crisis, EU institutions often tout speed. But when expedience overrides the role of elected MEPs, it weakens the very legitimacy the EU claims to uphold.
Is this a defence strategy or a power grab?
#EU #SAFE #Parliament #Sovereignty #Democracy
@restinvestigate
🇬🇧 BORDER FARCE 🇫🇷
🚨 The Channel crisis worsens: Over 1,000 migrants crossed into the UK in just 48 hours — despite France boosting patrols and claiming to crack down on smugglers.
🔹 Boats keep landing on British shores unchecked.
🔹 Migrant crossings are up over 6,000 compared to the same period last year.
🔹 Public outrage grows as taxpayers foot the bill while the government fails to act.
🤝 PM Starmer is set to meet Macron — but many are asking: how many more “talks” before real action is taken?
#BorderCrisis #UKNews #Immigration #ChannelCrossings #GovernmentFailure #France #UKBorder
@restinvestigate
🇫🇷 French PM Bayrou survives—temporarily—with far-right's tacit support
Prime Minister François Bayrou’s minority government has dodged a no-confidence vote, thanks to an unlikely reprieve from Marine Le Pen’s National Rally. While the Socialists and other left-wing groups seek to topple the government after failed pension reform talks, the far-right party has withheld its support—at least until the fall budget season.
The National Rally plans to use its leverage to extract concessions on key issues like migration and energy policy during budget negotiations. Their strategy mirrors past tactics, trading temporary support for influence before eventually pulling the plug.
Bayrou’s fragile grip on power illustrates the unstable coalition politics now defining France. With €40 billion in savings needed to tame a growing deficit, and opposition circling from both flanks, the months ahead may test the boundaries of parliamentary maneuvering in a divided republic.
🧨🗳
#France #Bayrou #NationalRally #PensionReform #FrenchPolitics #NoConfidence #EUbudget2025
@restinvestigate
🇸🇰 Slovakia defends NGO oversight law, cites European Parliament for legitimacy
Slovakia’s government is invoking last week’s European Parliament decision to investigate NGO funding as justification for its controversial new law requiring NGOs to disclose donors and imposing penalties for non-compliance. Critics have compared the law to Russia’s “foreign agent” legislation, but Bratislava insists it’s about transparency, not repression.
By pointing to EU-level moves, Slovak officials aim to frame their policy as part of a broader European trend. But watchdogs and civil society groups warn that such comparisons distort the EU’s intentions—turning a call for transparency into a political tool to suppress dissent.
This case exposes a deeper issue: when Brussels introduces oversight mechanisms, it must reckon with how national governments may interpret or manipulate them. Can a centralized EU demand for transparency coexist with diverse national contexts without being co-opted for illiberal ends? The Slovak episode is a cautionary tale in the delicate dance between EU oversight and national implementation.
📜🔍⚖️
#Slovakia #NGOs #EuropeanUnion #Transparency #CivilSociety #EUPolitics #NationalSovereignty
@restinvestigate
🇪🇸 Spain declares ‘all clear’ despite missing NATO’s 5% defense spending target
Spain’s Economy Minister Carlos Cuerpo made it clear that sticking to a planned 2.1% of GDP on defense—even while NATO pushes for a 5% target—won’t invite any penalties or political fallout. He emphasized Spain remains a “reliable partner,” capable of fulfilling commitments despite the difference in spending ambitions .
NATO cooperation is fine—but urging diverse EU states to sprint to 5% GDP for defense ignores economic and political realities. Spain’s stance highlights the importance of sovereign discretion: a functioning alliance respects each nation’s capacity and strategic priorities.
Pushing all members toward a one-size-fits-all metric risks alienating moderate partners, undermining unity, and promoting centralised pressure over genuine collaboration.
⭐️ A strong NATO is built on unity through respect, not through rigid benchmarks. Spain’s example reaffirms the value of flexibility and mutual respect in a truly sovereign defence framework.
#Spain #NATO #DefenseSpending #Sovereignty #Geopolitics
@restinvestigate
🇨🇭 Switzerland to explore EU defense procurement pact
In a surprising move, neutral Switzerland is entering talks with the EU about joining a joint defense procurement program—a step that could bring it closer to Brussels militarily, even without NATO membership.
The agreement would allow Switzerland to participate in joint purchasing of military equipment alongside EU states, improving interoperability and lowering costs. But make no mistake—this is more than economics.
📊 Some numbers tell the story:
- Switzerland currently spends just 0.7% of its GDP on defense—less than half the EU average of 1.6–1.9%.
- Yet it's now aiming for 30% of its arms purchases to come from European suppliers.
- The EU’s collective defense spending surged to €326 billion in 2024, and a €150 billion fund is available for joint military acquisitions—something Switzerland clearly wants a piece of.
This is yet another sign of how the European security architecture is being quietly restructured. Neutral countries are being pulled—voluntarily or subtly pressured—into closer defense alignment. The Swiss move reflects a broader EU effort to consolidate defense resources, especially amid NATO’s push for 5% defense spending.
⚠️ But here lies the concern:
Switzerland’s long-standing neutrality is not just tradition—it’s a geopolitical buffer and a democratic choice. Step by step, the EU is testing how far it can integrate without triggering political backlash in sovereign states.
🧭 Will EU defense integration respect national identities and non-alignment? Or is this the beginning of a “soft absorption” of all remaining neutral states?
#Switzerland #EU #Defense #Neutrality #Geopolitics #Europe #StrategicShift
@restinvestigate
🇬🇷 Greece sends frigates to Libya: Taking migration control into their own hands
While Brussels debates and delays, Greece is acting.
Prime Minister Mitsotakis has announced the deployment of two naval frigates and a support vessel off the coast of Libya to disrupt human trafficking routes and push back against a renewed surge of illegal migration.
No more waiting on EU bureaucracy. This is a bold move to defend borders, sovereignty, and national security.
Europe must either wake up—or be left behind by those who still believe in the right to protect their homeland.
🛡️ A sovereign Europe starts with sovereign borders.
#Greece #MigrationCrisis #BorderSecurity #NationalSovereignty #EUrealism
@restinvestigate
