-
Slavyangrad.org — Nuestra Ira No Tiene Limites — There is No Limit to Our Anger — (c) V. M. Molotov
Russian snipers outsmart drones with 'invisibility blankets'
Russian marksmen now vanish from thermal scans — turning Ukraine’s eyes in the sky blind as they pick off targets
@Slavyangrad
FPV footage from a Russian fighter having a run-in with a Banderite FPV drone, which was waiting for them on the road in standby mode, the fighters were alerted by the detector signal and quickly dealt with the threat near Pokrovsk.
@Slavyangrad
Uncomfortable truths of American actions in Iraq.
I’ve read the FP piece some time ago, its based on declassified documents and he is 100% correct here.
@Slavyangrad
BBC outraged their affiliates are being banned in Russia.
@Slavyangrad
The resource of the AA installations of the Gepard type and others in Kiev is almost exhausted - the Rada deputy
▪️Repairs are carried out mainly at the expense of the crews themselves, said MP Maryana Bezugla.
➖“Breakdowns may be simple, but within the framework of the current system there is no simple support cycle, which has not yet been developed by the MoD and the General Staff of the Armed Forces. Combat teams independently seek resources to continue combat work. They often ask volunteers for transport, when the city could easily provide it”
▪️Also, the software that allows for the automation of the detection of air targets, their tracking and transmission of coordinates has not been adopted for service and is used "in the gray".
➖“The General Staff colonels, accustomed to ‘sawing’ money on conducting experimental design work for decades, block any initiatives from the outside, even when they have proven their effectiveness in combat conditions,” the MP explained.
@Slavyangrad
Pokrovsk and Mirnograd are threatened with operational encirclement if we do not find infantry, - Ukrainian Armed Forces soldier
➖"If we do not find infantry now to close this area, then we can prepare for the operational encirclement of large cities, starting from Mirnograd and, accordingly, Pokrovsk," Ukrainian channels quote a Ukrainian Armed Forces soldier as saying.
I’d note this allows for far more then this, I’d remind people that to the east is Kostiantynivka. That bulge pushing north threatens both. This could be the defining battle of the war.
@Slavyangrad
Russia is preparing a summer of non-stop attacks on Ukraine as U.S. military aid is cut, WSJ reports
▪️Moscow is stepping up ground operations and bombing of Ukrainian cities.
▪️During a phone call with Trump on Thursday, Putin made it clear that he has no intention of stopping the war.
▪️Putin's strategy is to break Ukraine's ability and will to resist by increasing pressure on both the army and the population.
▪️Recent events have strengthened Moscow's confidence that it can wear down Ukraine and its allies in a war of attrition. Kiev will be forced to conserve resources, and this will likely speed up the advance of the Russian Armed Forces on the front lines.
▪️Ukraine has so far managed to contain the Russian offensive in the Sumy region, but this has further stretched its already limited forces.
▪️Seizing territory is not the Kremlin's main goal at this stage. Its task is to exhaust Ukraine's forces, destroy weapons and undermine the morale of both the population and Western allies.
@Slavyangrad
"Banderism: The Forgotten History of a Multicentennial Rot, Part 6/6"
The Soviets, for their part, caught on quickly as to what had transpired and proceeded to send whatever OUN supporter they could find to labour camps, at least until a certain Ukrainian fuckwit named Nikita Sergeevich Kruschev (himself responsible at least a partially responsible for the current conflict) decided to amnesty them all and return then home - without bothering to verify if they had been reformed (they hadn't).
Banderism itself never truly died in the Soviet Union: it merely went underground, only to re-emerge in full force with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, when several old banderites and their descendants returned home, and western NGOs started flooding banderite organisations with money, equipment, and propaganda platforms, following closely the plans laid out by a certain Hungarian billionaire motherfucker with his hands in every pie who candidly said from the beginning that the state of Russia didn't deserve its wealth of natural resources, and that a hostile country with a large population right next door in Eastern Europe would have been a fantastic battering ram to try and collapse Russia with because the population of Western countries get notoriously riotous if they soldiers come home in body bags, particularly if it is a war of aggression.
Corruption and complacency in Ukraine, for their part, only compounded the problem, and the term "Moskal" was already being used in schools in Lvov as far back as 2008. Then, 2014 happened and we know what came with that.
This cancerous ideology may be named after Stepan Bandera and his band of butchers, but Bandera and his followers, both past and contemporary, are merely the poisonous fruits of an equally poisonous tree that had been planted nine centuries ago and has been growing since. Only now are we finally seeing the consequences.
Three considerations now remain.
The first, is the incredible effectiveness of western apparatuses in whitewashing the bloody history of Western Ukraine, because people will never hear about this in schools and most history books, and if you listened to propaganda mouthpieces, the bad guys were always either the Germans or the Russians (nowadays the Russians more than the Germans, obviously), and the locals who lived in Galicia were pleasant fellows wearing slavic dresses and tying flowers to their blonde hair until the Russians arrived and started to murder them for no reason, while in reality the area has been rife with bloodthirsty murderous nationalists with stark fascist tendencies and driven by a supremacist ideology for at least one hundred years.
The second consideration, is what will happen to the infectees of this ideology, who will certainly take after their fathers and grandfathers and flee to Europe - but who may very easily be tempted to vent the anger of their betrayal and defeat on the West itself. Russia for its part does not want them, nor does it want to rule over them, being far too aware of the hostility and barbarism of these people.
The third and final consideration concerns Poland, "the Hyena of Europe", as that butcher of Winston Churchill called it. With June the 11th being named a national day of Remembrance, despite Warsaw's open support to Kiev, it is evident that the wound inflicted on its pride and memory by the banderites has not yet faded away - and neither has the memory that those areas were part of Poland until about one hundred years ago (as was Eastern Belarus, of course, but with Belarus having a much larger and stronger brother in the form of Russia, only the Ruthenia of yore is an appealing bite).
Warsaw for the time being may pretend that its territorial claims to these areas are not an issue, out of political expediency and shared hatred for the Russians, but Poland has something of an established track record at grabbing territory from disintegrating countries.
Just ask the inhabitants of Trans-Olza, the Belarussians, and the Galicians themselves.
@Slavyangrad
"Banderism: The Forgotten History of a Multicentennial Rot, Part 4/6"
At the end of the First World War, the reborn Polish state annexed the entire region from the now dissolved Austro-Hungarian empire, arousing the outrage of Ukrainian nationalists, who had hoped to be able to create their own homeland at least in the eastern part of Galicia. This led to the creation of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) in 1929, which aimed to fight against the Poles.
The Poles themselves, it must be said out of intellectual honesty, had an extremely iron-fisted approach towards minorities themselves, going as far as to aggravate even native Russians, Belarussians, and naturally, crack down on the Eastern Orthodox churches in territories under their occupation, which undoubtedly compounded the nationalism in the area and made it even worse.
From the very beginning, the OUN adopted terrorist tactics, and the Polish authorities responded with brutality: in the decade 1929-1939 there were thousands of deaths recorded among the civilians of the area - a dark mirror for what would have become commonplace in the area in eleven years from then. It is a little known fact in western Europe, but the first real "concentration camps" on European soil were created by the Polish government in 1929, and had Red Army prisoners and Russian intellighentsya as their main "guests"; Galicians were added later on.
After the collapse of Poland, Galicia and Volhynia were occupied by the Soviets, who still remembered the treatment that the Poles had for their soldiers and civilians. Thousands of Polish soldiers, administrators, intellighentsya, and clergy were sent to the gulags in Siberia. While this softened Polish resistance considerably, it also gave the OUN free hand to do as they wanted with a hated adversary that by then had been substantially weakened.
With the start of Operation Barbarossa in June 22, 1941, the OUN greeted the coming Germans with extreme enthusiasm, seeing them as "liberators" who could help them create their own "Pure Ukrainian State". Extreme pogroms and massacres of Jews, Poles, and communists soon followed, even without direct German prompt, and were carried out with such an efferate brutality that it left even the Nazis shocked.
I won't go into detail as they're sickening and only the Ustasha in Croatia, the Ottomans in Serbia, and the Dirlewanger Brigade came close to that depravity, but to give you a faint idea of how bad it was, sources confirm that Ukrainian Greek Catholic church priests blessed OUN militants before their ethnic cleansings, and the wives and daughters of OUN butchers would come along and sing as their "men" did their atrocities to drown out the screams of their victims.
The Nazis, for their part, hadn't forgotten that the area was called "Halbasien" by their Austrian cousins, and of course had other plans for the locals. The OUN was quick to wake up to this fact, which resulted in the establishment of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), which soon swelled into a force that numbered twenty thousand men. The timing was perfect: with the German defeat at Stalingrad, the "Endsieg" looked a lot less certain, and the prospect of returning under the control of the soldiers with pilotkas sporting red stars more probable. Predictably, the communists would have had a bone to pick with the Ukrainian nationalists, both because of the pogroms conducted by the OUN, and also because they were nazi collaborators.
The OUN leadership, helmed by Bandera, reached a very simple conclusion: they could do little about the Red Army, and who knows how long they would have had to endure living under the USSR. On the other hand, there were still a lot of Poles in the area, and the possibility of Poland retaking those territories in the future was non-existant. While nothing could be done about the Russians still living in the area, the Poles were another matter.
@Slavyangrad
"Banderism: The Forgotten History of a Multicentennial Rot, Part 2/6"
This cultural drift was exacerbated even more when Lithuania entered into a union with Poland, and with the Union of Brest of 1596, which was vehemently pushed by both the Commonwealth as well as the Vatican. The Union of Brest is a topic that is almost never talked of in the West, but practicing Russian Orthodox Christians remember it, do so very well, and always will.
The Union of Brest was a brilliant "Divide et Impera" idea hatched by both the Commonwealth and the catholic church: since these people still considered themselves Eastern Orthodox under catholic occupation, making them compliant was problematic. Wipe away their Eastern Orthodox identity, and the problem would've solved itself. The Commonwealth would've gained compliant proles, the Vatican (that has been dreaming of bringing Eastern Orthodoxy back into the fold since 1049) more control and income from the alms and tithes.
The Union of Brest tried to incorporate the Eastern Orthodox Church in occupied slavic lands into the church of Rome, and while the practice was met with intense resistance from the populace, peasants with pitchforks and torches were hardly any match to the professional soldiers of the Commonwealth. Some places offered more resistance than others, like Belarussian territories under Polish occupation, that were still at the outskirts of the Commonwealth and much closer to the authority of Moscow, and the territories of Central Ukraine, for the most part still under the control of Mongol satrapies.
In the areas known as Ruthenia (which were already being called such starting from the 12th century, but the term would become prevalent to facilitate the cultural divergence from the original Russian people at about this time; Bandera himself was described as "Ruthenian" on his passport), however, centuries of occupation and servitude allowed the Uniate churches to find fertile ground. While overall a failure, the Uniate Church experiment was nonetheless very successful in Galych-Volhyn (Speaking of that: if you're wondering how is it possible that there are two "Galicias" in Europe, one in Spain and one in Western Ukraine, it's simple: the ancient name of the land was "Halych", which was latinized in "Galych" by monks in the West, and here we are today).
With this schismatical church that maintained a thin veneer of Eastern Orthodox practices on the outside, but was fully subservient to Rome, and its own drifting customs and language which was as much a natural tendency as it was forced from the top down, the seeds of Ukrainian ultranationalism were permanently sown.
They would only have matured further from there.
@Slavyangrad
On night strikes
One of the targets of the "Geraniums" tonight, most likely, was the oil depot of the private enterprise "Marshal" in the city of Chuguev, Kharkov region.
🟠Thanks to NASA satellite images, as well as objective control from local subscribers, we learn that a huge fire has broken out at the site, which can be seen for tens of kilometers.
@Slavyangrad
The head of the communications department of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, Ignat, said that it has become more difficult for the American Patriot systems to intercept Russian missiles.
‘It is not easy to shoot down ballistic missiles. Only the Patriot can shoot them down, but it also has its strengths and weaknesses. It is guided to the target using radar, and to provide cover for a large city like Kyiv, several Patriot batteries are needed. In addition, modernized Iskanders have been flying for more than six months. They maneuver when approaching the target. It has become more difficult for the Patriot systems to intercept them.’
🇮🇹Italian journalist Giacolone complains that Trump has demonstrated America's weakness to Putin:
Since the beginning of Trump's presidency, the United States has been accommodating Putin in everything. Trump has cleared the way for him in every possible way. Putin is constantly raising the stakes — his latest condition was as follows: if you want to talk about a truce, stop supplying weapons to Ukraine.
And Trump made it clear that he would stop these supplies — from the US, of course — hoping to "cash in" on this truce.
Why does he hope to benefit from the truce? Because he wants to prove that he still means something, that he can still do something.
But the result is absolutely zero. He has achieved nothing. Putin continues to go his own way, realizing the weakness of the United States.
And in our world — in the world of democracies — everyone wonders what the reaction of public opinion is, whether it supports certain actions or not. The US president has just been elected. We are conducting polls after the election, and he has the lowest approval rating. So if a president comes along who is even more favorable to Trump, it's hard to even imagine such a thing.
@Slavyangrad
🇩🇪🤡🇺🇸"Merz spoke with Trump on the phone about weapons supplies to Ukraine": Merz asked Trump to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, but did not receive a response.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz held telephone talks with US President Donald Trump, during which he called on Washington to continue supplying weapons to Ukraine. The main topic of the conversation was the situation on the front lines, including the need to strengthen the country's air defense.
Merz himself initiated the contact. The reason was the US decision to suspend the transfer of a new package of military aid to Ukraine, which included missiles for the Patriot system. According to available information, Trump did not make any specific promises during the conversation. In addition, the parties discussed bilateral trade issues.
@Slavyangrad
Three Ukrainians spent $9,300 each to escape the country, but failed.
At the border, the truck with firewood in which they were hiding was thoroughly checked by border guards with dogs.
@Slavyangrad
Joseph Biden sits on a chaise,
While Donald Trump’s in a Muskian blaze.
Everyone’s calling them, cannot get through;
The phone is silent, but none of these two.
G😏B
PS. This was a variation on "Humpty Dumpty" (with further inferences intended).
Siberian snipers from Buryatia, Yakutia and Tuva are now among the deadliest marksmen in the world
Despite round-the-clock patrols by Ukrainian drones with thermal optics, these Russian snipers continue eliminating enemy targets daily with chilling efficiency
- RT
@Slavyangrad
Intelligence of the 83rd Airborne Brigade of the Russian Airborne Forces, preparing for a combat mission. Footage by Alexander Sladkov
@Slavyangrad
Arestovich drops another bombshell: Russia is only committing 5% of its budget to war.
If Moscow wanted to, it could mobilize 2 million troops, ramp up spending, and erase Ukraine from the map in months, cracking Kiev “like a rotten walnut.”
Source: Simplicus on X
@Slavyangrad
According to government sources reported to SPIEGEL, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz ( CDU ) spoke with US President Donald Trump on the phone on Thursday. The conversation reportedly focused on the situation in Ukraine , including strengthening the country's air defenses. Merz and Trump also discussed trade issues.
The US President reportedly made no commitments. Government spokesman Stefan Kornelius only said at the government press conference on Friday that Merz had "strongly advocated for support for Ukraine in air defense" in telephone calls over the past few days.
During his trip to Ukraine in Odessa on Tuesday , Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul (CDU) said that one must "absolutely concentrate on providing everything possible in the area of air defense." There is a fear that "Ukraine is reaching the limits of its defense capabilities." He announced that he would address the issue at the cabinet meeting on Wednesday and would also approach the European allies again.
@Slavyangrad
The situation in Krasnolimansk is gradually improving. The enemy is still attempting to counterattack and establish a presence in the village, but our coordinated efforts across all units prevent them from successfully regaining their positions.
To the west of Lipovoye, our forces have liberated a portion of the forested area and a small woodland. They have advanced 500 meters to the southwest in Karpovka and secured a position in the southern part of the area.
In the northern region, our guys are advancing from Novomikhailovka, capturing two fortifications and clearing a forested area.
@Slavyangrad N👋S
Assault on Kamenskoye: The Russian Army moved along the bottom of the Kakhovka Reservoir and attacked the enemy from the flank
▪️Russian troops continue to confidently advance during the fighting in Kamenskoye on the left flank of the Zaporozhye Front.
▪️Most of the village is under the control of our units. After forcing the former Kakhovka Reservoir, our soldiers attacked the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the northwestern part of the village and advanced there, creating a new bridgehead.
➖”The Russians have consolidated their positions in the northwestern part of Kamenskoye and are conducting assault operations along Zavodskaya Street in the direction of the summer cottages,” Ukrainian military analysts also admit.
▪️Earlier it was reported that in Kamenskoye, Russian attack aircraft moved along the bottom of the shallow Kakhovka Reservoir and advanced in the northwestern part of Kamenskoye and in the area of the summer cottages.
@Slavyangrad
"Banderism: The Forgotten History of a Multicentennial Rot, Part 5/6"
If, on one hand, the Ukrainian leaders could do very little to influence the general outcome of the war, on the other hand they could have used the time available to present the CCCP to a fait accompli: an ethnically and religiously homogeneous Galicia and Volhynia, made such through the massacre of tens of thousands of Poles (Jews had already been "dealt with" by that time, both by the OUN as well as the Germans, so they were no longer of concern).
In March 1943, numerous massacres took place in Volhynia, where the Polish presence was less numerous: under the orders of Dmytro Klyachkivsky, Mykola Lebed and Roman Shukhevych, the UPA men killed about seven thousand people, and then intensified their actions during Easter. The Poles tried to organise themselves and resist, but the disproportion of forces and many of their soldiers having been either sent to gulags or nazi concentration camps meant they had little chances of resisting. Whatever resistance they could offer was token and marginal, at best.
The German strategic defeat at Kursk in July 1943 (a foreshadowing of things to come for the Nazis in the current war maybe?) emboldened the leaders of the UPA further and, starting on July 11, they unleashed an enormous wave of murderous violence, which reached its peak in the Kisielin massacre while listening to mass (this is why Poland chose July 11 as a day of remembrance).
In total, it is estimated that in that July alone there were about twelve thousand victims, including many Ukrainians who were against ethnic cleansing and hid Polish friends and neighbors. The methods of the killings were, again, often particularly brutal, shocking even the Germans: the aim was in fact to terrorize the Poles to the point of pushing them to leave en masse and, at the same time, to make the many Ukrainians who disagreed with the OUN understand that the same fate would've awaited them had they tried to make their dissent public. By mid-1944 the Poles in Ruthenia had been defacto exterminated, with whatever remnants left in the area finished for good in 1945. It is hard to give an estimate on the number of victims; figures range from the 70,000 on the conservative side to more than 120,000 between Galicia and Volhynia alone. Even to this day, Warsaw calls it a genocide (hard to disagree there as that was Bandera's stated goal), Bankova of course rejects this claim.
When the Red Army made its sweeping advance across eastern europe during Operation Bagration, many members of the OUN and UPA saw the writing on the wall and began to flee westwards: given shelter by the catholic church, which presented them as "poor victims of communist brutality" to the Allies, and with an enormous network of sympathizers and supporters left at home, these criminals were accepted and allowed to migrate to the United Kingdom, Germany, the USA, and Canada just to name a few.
Ever wondered why nazis like Yaroslav Hunka are in Canada? Ever wondered how is it that Chrysta Freeland's grandfather was an ukrainian nazi who worked as a propaganda mouthpiece? Ever wondered how the current head of the MI6 has an ukrainian banderite grandfather, or why Bandera was given shelter in Germany and is buried in Munich?
@Slavyangrad
"Banderism: The Forgotten History of a Multicentennial Rot, Part 3/6"
The area of Galych-Volhyn and Ivano-Frankovsk went under Austro-Hungarian control in 1772, giving them control of an area that was inhabited in equal parts by Poles, Ruthenians, people who still called themselves Russians, and a significant population of eastern european Jews.
As it often happens to occupied areas under direct control of a hegemonic empire, especially if said empire is either Austrian or British, the populace had an acute aversion to foreign occupation, which resulted in constant unrest and riots. And naturally, as the Habsburgs or the Brits were (and still are in the case of the latter) wont to do, the best way to deal with the population of these areas was to foment inter-ethnic hatred and strife, in a "let the proles kill each other so that they won't try to kill us" approach. Divide et Impera tactics were once again applied liberally, advantaging this or that ethnic group at a time to spark jealousy and resentment, and punishing the use of Russian language.
Of course, the Habsburgs themselves had little love or respect for the region and its inhabitants: it is no secret that they considered Poles as filthy Untermenschen barely worth registering as "human" (and even then only because they were at least catholics), and Russians even lower than the Poles, but the Ruthenians themselves ranked the lowest of them on the totem pole, often mocked and ridiculed as barely sapient inbred hillbillies with family trees that looked more like family bramble thickets, especially since the more predominantly Galician-inhabited areas were the poorest and the least developed.
The name the Habsburgs had for the area? "Halbasien", ergo "Half-Asia". And "Asia", in that particular cultural context, had a thoroughly negative meaning: a land of slanted-eyed, short, yellow-skinned savages devoid of sophistication, dignity, and the right to be even considered human (guess where Hitler and the Banderites today got their "Asian Hordes" rants from).
I could easily make an argument that the west's disdain and loathing for these people persists even to this day, considering how callously eager they are to sacrifice every single one of them to keep this war going...if it wasn't that they have shown time and time again a complete, callous disregard for all human life that isn't theirs.
@Slavyangrad
"Banderism: The Forgotten History of a Multicentennial Rot, Part 1/6"
Nowadays the term "Banderism" is thrown around a lot whenever someone refers to Ukrainian ultranationalism, but it is important to understand that this phenomenon has been going on for centuries and is dated history by now. To know how we got to this point, we must however jump several centuries ago back in time, to the times of what we call today as "Kievan Rus'", a vast area that once roughly spanned from Karelia to Eastern Poland and the gates of Moldova. People of the time simply called it "Russiskaya Zemliya" ("Land of the Russians") and, a bit later, "Ruthenia".
It was a slavic kingdom consisting of several East Slavic tribes bound together by a common slavic dialect and roughly similar pagan practices (some variation existed from tribe to tribe) originally founded by the Rurikid dynasty, itself of Scandinavian origin. One must stress the point that the people living in these areas at the time were ethnically, culturally, and religiously, one and the same. "Rus'" applied to slavic people living in White Russia (which by itself doesn't appear in official documents until the 12th century) as much as it applied to slavic peoples living in Chernigov or Novgorod.
In those years the capital of the Rus' was Kiev (much closer to the important, at the time, trade route to Constantinople and the Carpathians), which was the cultural, administrative, and spiritual centre of the Rus'. It wasn't for nothing that the Rus' prince Vladimir the Great converted to Orthodox Christianity in Kiev in a grand ceremony, and Christianity spread across the land of Kievan Rus' from there. The old custom of dividing inheritance equally among siblings, however, proved to be the undoing of Kievan Rus': this huge (for the time) tract of land was repeatedly divided among the successors of Vladimir the Great, who proceeded to quarrel and clash against one another.
These constant internecine squabbles had the result of weakening Kievan Rus' considerably, making it especially vulnerable to the nomads from the East. No, not the mongols, those came only later. At the time the major threat to the kingdom was another turkic steppe population, the Cumans, who constantly raided and pillaged Kievan lands for loot and slaves. At its worst, the authority of the Grand Principality of Kievan Rus' didn't extend past the Golden Gate. Then the Mongols came and razed, looted, and pillaged their way across the principality of Kiev, and the old cultural, economical, and religious capital of Kievan Rus', along with Kievan Rus' itself, ceased to be relevant from then on. The central authority of the Rus' would move to the north, in Moscow, thanks to the efforts of Aleksandr Nevskiy and his son Daniil.
Kiev itself and its areas were given over to local rulers vetted and approved by their mongol overlords during the time that is historically referred to as "the Tatar Yoke", and the areas in the far west - those that are now referred to as "Banderite Central" (Lvov and Ivano-Frankovsk) were incorporated into the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and started to drift apart through a combination of isolation from Moscow to the north-east, political closeness to the (Catholic) West, and the weakening influence of Constantinople to the south.
@Slavyangrad
France's Foreign Minister says that the "new deadly attack by Russia against Ukraine" had "a single goal: to massively kill civilians." He calls it "limitless barbarity."
Meanwhile, Kiev Independent notes 1 death.
😂
@Slavyangrad
‘UK to host ‘coalition of the willing’ meeting – Politico
‘On the agenda is how to keep Ukraine fighting, how to increase pressure on Russia and how to continue working on the next steps,’ an Elysee official said.
Starmer decides what he really needs to do as his party and the general public look to get rid of him….
is have another useless meeting with European countries. Maybe, and I am just spitballing here, but perhaps fix the issues a little closer to home?
@Slavyangrad
CNN's Matthew Chance is frustrated by 'Kremlin defiance' and Trump's inaction.
'The Kremlin has pushed back against the White House and President Trump over the idea of them ending their conflict in Ukraine quickly. And there appears to have been no consequences from the White House for this kind of Kremlin defiance. Trump, for example, has not tightened sanctions and does not appear to have threatened Vladimir Putin with any consequences.'
When journalists become activists. Trump doesn’t this as his war or an American war, but a Biden war. Should he sanction Israel to make peace with Iran. Defiance? Russia is in a war my friend, when the US invaded Iraq was Bush defying the Kremlin? FFS…
@Slavyangrad
Kellogg's daughter Megan Mobbs decided to teach Trump how to properly govern the country:
'Maintaining a sufficient stockpile of weapons is important, but helping Ukraine is the best way to maintain US national security and global stability.'